Home  - Basic_C - Canadian Supreme Court

Books Baby Camera Phones Computers Games DVD Electronics Kitchen Magazines Music Garden Software Tools Toys Video Apparel & Accessories Jewelry & Watches Musical Instruments Health & Personal Care Beauty Sports & Outdoors Office Products

e99.com Bookstore

Images

Newsgroups

41-44 of 44    Back | 1  | 2  | 3

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

Canadian Supreme Court:     more books (69)

U.S. Supreme Court declines to review judgment that Canadian company's BlackBerry wireless communicator infringes U.S. patents of plaintiff though its ... An article from: International Law Update Mr. Justice David Brown.(Ontario Supreme Court appoints David M. Brown): An article from: Catholic Insight by Rory Leishman, 2006-11-01 We don't understand: do you have our Supreme Court decision?: An article from: Windspeaker by Unavailable, 2009-12-01 Did Canada vote against both Liberals and the Supreme Court of Canada?(COLUMNIST): An article from: Catholic Insight by Herman Goodden, 2006-05-01 Supreme Court rules seizure of band's funds legal.(news): An article from: Wind Speaker by Paul Barnsley, 2007-02-01 Court urges government action.(ruling from Supreme Court of Canada on Aboriginal rights): An article from: Wind Speaker by Paul Barnsley, 2003-10-01 In patent action by U.S. drug company, Supreme Court of Canada decides whether to allow appeal of Canadian drug company from order issued under recent ... An article from: International Law Update Rejecting defenses of fraud, ordre public, and denial of justice, Supreme Court of Canada rules 6 to 3 that Canadian courts should enforce substantial ... An article from: International Law Update Brian Dickson: A Judge's Journey (Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History) by Kent Roach, Robert J. Sharpe, 2003-11-20 Charting new territory? Fifteen years of search and seizure decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada, 1982-1997.: An article from: American Review of Canadian Studies by C.L. Ostberg, 2000-03-22 B.C. government attempts to abandon court fights.(news): An article from: Wind Speaker by Paul Barnsley, 2005-04-01 M vs H does not affect marriage, yet.(ruling in Canadian gay rights case)(Brief Article): An article from: Catholic Insight Canadian Father Jailed for Murder of His Disabled Daughter.(Robert Latimer)(Brief Article): An article from: National Right to Life News by Liz Townsend, 2001-02-01 The Vaid case and the protection of parliamentary employees against human rights discrimination.(Towards a Theory of Parliamentary Privilege in Canadian ... article from: Canadian Parliamentary Review by Serge Joyal, 2005-12-22

lists with details

41. Canadian Supreme Court Allows Third Party Registration Of Famous Mark ('Barbie')
    Canadian Supreme Court Allows Third Party Registration of Famous Mark ('Barbie') for Dissimilar Goods (a Restaurant Chain). find Mondaq Business Briefing articles. div id  
    http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-146747890.html
    
    Extractions: Please enter a keyword above. Articles Reference News Wires, White Papers, and Books Mondaq Business Briefing news wires June 2006 Related articles Mattel, Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc., 2006 SCC 22 On 2 June 2006, the Supreme Court of Canada handed down its decision in Mattel, Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc., 2006 SCC 22. Take home In Canada, the mere fame of a famous trade mark will not protect it from registration by another company filing in respect of dissimilar goods or services. In coming to its conclusion, the Canadian Supreme Court reiterated that this is a factual question to be assessed in each case, and held that there was no likelihood of confusion between the marks even though they were similar in appearance. Read all of this article with a FREE trial Find articles, research, and archives

42. Weblog: Canadian Supreme Court Backs Same-Sex Marriage | Christianity Today | A
    Christianity Today continues as a leader in providing informative editorial on current events, news from a Christian perspective, Christian doctrine, issues and trends.  
    http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2004/decemberweb-only/12-6-41.0.html
    
    Extractions: subscription ... More info November 14, 2010 Free Newsletters: RSS Feeds Audio Twitter Home December (Web-only) Christianity Today, December (Web-only), 2004 Weblog: Canadian Supreme Court Backs Same-Sex Marriage Plus: Another religion clash in Egypt, a Baylor bump, and other stories from online sources around the world. Compiled by Ted Olsen posted 12/01/2004 12:00AM "Several centuries ago it would have been understood that marriage should be available only to opposite-sex couples," the Supreme Court of Canada ruled this morning. "The recognition of same-sex marriage in several Canadian jurisdictions as well as two European countries belies the assertion that the same is true today." Canada's federal government may therefore change the legal definition of marriage in that country, the court said. Those opposed to same-sex marriage are heartened that the Supreme Court did not rule that Parliament must change the definition of marriage. Many such groups in the U.S. have argued that the chief issue in this country's marriage debate has less to do with sexual ethics than with judicial overrides of the democratic process.

43. Canada Court: AWOL U.S. Soldiers Not Refugees - World News - Mideast/N. Africa -
    The Supreme Court of Canada on Thursday refused to hear an appeal by two U.S. military deserters who sought refuge in the country to avoid deployment to Iraq, a conflict they  
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21794024/
    
    Extractions: var collarity_appid = 'msnbc';var collarity_kw = 'Canada,Iraq';var collarity_tags = ''; Jump to story headline Conflict in Iraq on msnbc.com Search ad info ad info Mike Cassese Reuters file By Kari Huus Reporter msnbc.com msnbc.com updated 11/15/2007 5:21:24 PM ET The Supreme Court of Canada on Thursday refused to hear an appeal by two U.S. military deserters who sought refuge in the country to avoid deployment to Iraq, a conflict they argued is “immoral and illegal.” The announcement ends a bid by American soldiers Jeremy Hinzman and Brandon Hughey, the plaintiffs in the case, to win refugee status and opens the way for them to be deported to the United States, where they could face court martial for going AWOL and missing troop movements.  It also could lead to deportation of dozens of other American soldiers who have filed formal applications for refugee status.  “Theoretically they (are) facing immediate removal,” said Jeffry House, a Toronto lawyer who represents most of the U.S. refugee applicants, including Hinzman and Hughey. The Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the case, “vastly advances the government’s agenda to remove them,” he said.

44. Canadian Supreme Court Rebukes Death Penalty - RT� News
    The Canadian Supreme Court has ruled that two men wanted for murder in the United States should be extradited only if prosecutors give assurances that they will not face the  
    http://www.rte.ie/news/2001/0216/canada.html

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

41-44 of 44    Back | 1  | 2  | 3