101. Welcome To Paradox Offering a range of smoking devices, accessories and body piercing information. http://www.paradox.co.uk/

102. Paradox Australian Shepherds Breed standard and frequently asked questions. Westhampton. http://www.paradoxaustralianshepherds.com/

Paradox Australian Shepherds ASCA Hall of Fame Kennel USASA Hall of Fame Breeder Alison Smith 250 Southampton Road Westhampton MA 01027 phone preferred) thegrinningdog@me.com Fax 413.529.9958

103. Paradoxe Croisieres - Guadeloupe Day charters on sailing catamarans to the islands of the Guadeloupean archipelago. http://www.im-caraibes.com/gsm/paradoxe-gb.htm

Day cruises in the archipelago of Guadeloupe: Petite-Terre, Marie-Galante, with Our pride catamaran of 25m (82ft), specially designed for your comfort (very stable) and your security (approved by Veritas and Merchant Navy) will take you to the islands of your dreams. Accompanied by our skilled crew, efficient but nevertheless discreet, you'll have a very pleasant sailing trip and you'll discover our splendid archipelago - its contrasting landscapes and colors. D A R E to sail to Petite-Terre (Monday, Wednesday, Saturday) Two isles (nature reservation) lined by white sandy beaches and surrounded by turquoise waters - a "Robinson" day. Bathing, snorkelling followed by aperitifs and lunch in the shadow of the palm trees at beachside. As a digestive, we propose a stroll around the isle to visit its sole inhabitants, iguanas. D A R E to sail to Marie-Galante (Tuesday, Thursday) Marie-Galante is the biggest isle depending on Guadeloupe. Her nickname is "big cookie", she is also known as the "100 windmill island". We'll arrive at app. 9:30 AM on the beach "Anse Canot", where you can bathe and suntan. After a fish BBQ you will discover the island through a commented bus tour during 2h30. Return at the marina at about 6:00 PM. D A R E to sail to (groups only, upon reservation)

104. Grandfather Paradox Time travel is impossible as exemplified by the famous grandfather paradox. Imagine you build a time machine. It is possible for you to travel back in time, http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/grandfather_paradox.html

Grandfather Paradox Time travel is impossible as exemplified by the famous grandfather paradox. Imagine you build a time machine. It is possible for you to travel back in time, meet your grandfather before he produces any children (i.e. your father/mother) and kill him. Thus, you would not have been born and the time machine would not have been built, a paradox. Perhaps the craziest of the time travel paradoxes was cooked up by Robert Heinlein in his classic short story "All You Zombies." A baby girl is mysteriously dropped off at an orphanage in Cleveland in 1945. "Jane" grows up lonely and dejected, not knowing who her parents are, until one day in 1963 she is strangely attracted to a drifter. She falls in love with him. But just when things are finally looking up for Jane, a series of disasters strike. First, she becomes pregnant by the drifter, who then disappears. Second, during the complicated delivery, doctors find that Jane has both sets of sex organs, and to save her life, they are forced to surgically convert "her" to a "him." Finally, a mysterious stranger kidnaps her baby from the delivery room. Reeling from these disasters, rejected by society, scorned by fate, "he" becomes a drunkard and drifter. Not only has Jane lost her parents and her lover, but he has lost his only child as well. Years later, in 1970, he stumbles into a lonely bar, called Pop's Place, and spills out his pathetic story to an elderly bartender. The sympathetic bartender offers the drifter the chance to avenge the stranger who left her pregnant and abandoned, on the condition that he join the "time travelers corps." Both of them enter a time machine, and the bartender drops off the drifter in 1963. The drifter is strangely attracted to a young orphan woman, who subsequently becomes pregnant.

105. Paradox - New World Encyclopedia Robert Boyle 's selfflowing flask fills itself in this diagram, but perpetual motion machines cannot exist (according to our present understanding of physics). http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Paradox

Paradox From New World Encyclopedia Jump to: navigation search Previous (Paradigm) Next (Paraffin) For other uses, see Paradox (disambiguation). Robert Boyle 's self-flowing flask fills itself in this diagram, but perpetual motion machines cannot exist (according to our present understanding of physics). A paradox was originally something that was contrary to received or common opinion. The term paradox comes from the Greek para ("contrary to") and doxa ("opinion"). From that, the term came to be used for something that was contrary to, or contradicted, common sense. Today the term is usually used for something that is an apparently true statement or group of statements that leads to a contradiction or a situation which defies intuition. Sometimes either the statements in question do not really imply the contradiction and the puzzling result is not really a contradiction, or the premises themselves are not all really true, or cannot all be true together. The recognition of ambiguities, equivocations, and unstated assumptions underlying known paradoxes has sometimes led to significant advances in science

106. Einsteins Incompleteness Argument Another site describing the EPR paradox. http://roxanne.roxanne.org/epr/einstein1.html

One of the first physicsts to be publically troubled by the philosophical interpretations of quantum mechanics was Albert Einstein. In 1935, he co-authored a paper which was intended to show that Quantum Mechanics could not be a complete theory of nature. The arguments in the EPR paper are very similar to ones which Einstein himself made in correspondences to friends, but are not exactly the same. The first thing to notice is that Einstein was not trying to disprove Quantum Mechanics in any way. In fact, he was well aware of its power to predict the outcomes of various experiments. What he was trying to show was that Quantum Mechanics could not be a complete theory of nature and that some other theory would have to be invoked in order to fully describe nature. The argument begins by assuming that there are two systems, A and B (which might be two free particles) , whose wavefunctions are known. Then, if A and B interact for a short period of time, one can determine the wavefunction which results after this interaction via the Schroedinger equation or some other Quantum Mechanical equation of state. Now, let us assume that A and B move far apart, so far apart that they can no longer interact in any fashion. In other words

107. Russell’s Paradox [Internet Encyclopedia Of Philosophy] by KC Klement 2005 http://www.iep.utm.edu/par-russ/

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy A B C ... Z all classes is itself a class, and so it seems to be in itself. The null or empty class, however, must not be a member of itself. However, suppose that we can form a class of all classes (or sets) that, like the null class, are not included in themselves. The paradox arises from asking the question of whether this class is in itself. It is if and only if it is not. The other form is a contradiction involving properties. Some properties seem to apply to themselves, while others do not. The property of being a property is itself a property, while the property of being a cat is not itself a cat. Consider the property that something has just in case it is a property (like that of being a cat ) that does not apply to itself. Does this property apply to itself? Once again, from either assumption, the opposite follows. The paradox was named after Bertrand Russell (1872-1970), who discovered it in 1901. Table of Contents History Possible Solutions to the Paradox of Properties Possible Solutions to the Paradox of Classes or Sets References and Further Reading 1. History Principles of Mathematics Principles was dedicated to discussing the contradiction, and an appendix was dedicated to the theory of types that Russell suggested as a solution.

108. Paradox Compensation Advisors - The Premier Dallas HR Consulting And Compensatio paradox Compensation Advisors specializes in helping clients large and small develop and implement compensation programs that are aligned with their business mission and http://paradoxcompadvisors.com/

109. Morphological Paradoxes A review of some of the key questions in modern morphology. http://www2.hawaii.edu/~bender/paradox.html

[back to list of essays] MORPHOLOGICAL PARADOXES Byron W. Bender University of Hawai`i n. A seemingly contradictory statement that may nonetheless be true: the paradox that standing is more tiring than walking. One exhibiting inexplicable or contradictory aspects : "You have the paradox of a Celt being the smooth Oxonian" (Anthony Burgess). An assertion that is essentially self-contradictory, though based on a valid deduction from acceptable premises. A statement contrary to received opinion. [ Latin paradoxum, from Greek paradoxon, from neuter sing. of paradoxos, conflicting with expectation : para-, beyond; see PARA-1 + doxa, opinion (from dokein, to think...).] American Heritage Dictionary. INTRODUCTION It is my intention in this brief paper to raise what I consider to be some of the key questions in morphology today. In so doing, I will be anything but neutral, and perhaps even provocative, in the way I state them. If that is how I am perceived, I will have succeeded in my purpose, which is to arouse curiosity and stir debate. On many of them we have been floundering all too long; the time has come to face them head-on. The answers are not easy, and will not be found in this paper. At most, I will suggest a few avenues to explore. [This is the written version of a talk on morphology given as a guest lecture in Ling 615

110. Paradox At the 41st edition of the Rencontres d Arles photography festival, paradox was proud to present a record number of new projects. Among these were Via PanAm http://www.paradox.nl/

111. Paradox@Everything2.com In Mage the Ascension, paradox (with a capital P) is how reality responds to mage s who decide that their will is how things should be done. paradox takes its toll on the mage http://www.everything2.com/title/Paradox

Near Matches Ignore Exact Everything Paradox ("Paradox" is also a: user cooled by WonkoDSane idea by Belgarath Sat Nov 13 1999 at 8:47:52 A situation in logic whereby two solutions can be derived from the same proof , but those conclusions contradict one another. However, taken individually, both cases are valid. I like it! thing by ModernAngel Sun Jan 16 2000 at 17:16:59 Borland 's database product, targetted to the business desktop Windows user . Competes with Microsoft 's Access product. I like it! idea by JarickCWAL Wed Jan 17 2001 at 22:57:37 In Mage the Ascension , Paradox (with a capital P) is how reality responds to mage s who decide that their will is how things should be done. Paradox takes its toll on the mage in a number of ways... Paradox Flaws screw with the mage's surroundings. People might suddenly become transparent , the walls might scream for vengeance because you nailed a picture on them, glass becomes sand and bubbles a bit, and the television might explode. These are generally the least harmful of the lot, but are never harmless. Physical Backlash occurs when a mage accumulates a number of Paradox points at once. Energy burns through the mage's body, quite possibly causing him to explode in a bloody mess.

112. Bertrand's Box Paradox - Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia Article from Wikipedia describing this problem and its solution. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand's_box_paradox

Bertrand's box paradox From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation search Bertrand's box paradox is a classic paradox of elementary probability theory . It was first posed by Joseph Bertrand in his Calcul des probabilités , published in 1889. There are three boxes: a box containing two gold coins, a box with two silver coins, and a box with one of each. After choosing a box at random and withdrawing one coin at random that happens to be a gold coin, it may seem that the probability that the remaining coin is gold has a probability of ; in fact, the probability is actually . Two problems that are logically equivalent are the Monty Hall problem and the Three Prisoners problem In a 1950 article, Warren Weaver introduced a simple way to conduct the experiment on people: the boxes are replaced by cards, and gold and silver coins are replaced by red and black markings, one marking placed on each of the two faces of each card. In what Martin Gardner has called the three-card swindle , a card is drawn from a hat, and if a red mark is shown, the dealer bets the victim even money that the other side is also red. The victim is convinced that the bet is fair, but the dealer makes money in the long run by winning of the time.

113. Game's Home Page A site about Parrando s paradox alternating two losing games yield a winning game. http://seneca.fis.ucm.es/parr/GAMES/

Parrondo's paradoxical games by Juan M.R. Parrondo The original games in brief. A detailed discussion. Papers and links on Brownian ratchets. ... The seminal document on the games.

114. Paradox London - Wedding Shoes And Bridal Accessories paradox London, designer wedding shoes and bridal accessories. Suppliers of Benjamin Adams, Pink, Little Miss Pink and Belle collections. http://www.paradoxlondon.com/

AC_FL_RunContent( 'codebase','http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,28,0','width','320','height','240','title','Paradox London','class','imgBorderGrey','src','Movie/Paradox-2010-v5','quality','high','pluginspage','http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash','movie','Movie/Paradox-2010-v5' ); //end AC code

115. Rattus Rattus’ Blog Devoted to self-contradiction, the liar s paradox, and other paradoxes. http://blog.rats.at/

116. Paradox Designs paradox Designs . Adobe Illustrator Cs4 (.ai) SVG. Enjoy. Read more Older Posts . © Original content 20072010 paradox Designs. http://paradoxdgn.com/

117. EPR Paradox - Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia Measurement performed on one part of a quantum system can have an instantaneous effect on the result of a measurement performed on another part. Entaglment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_paradox

EPR paradox From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation search This article includes a list of references , related reading or external links , but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations Please improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate (May 2009) The neutrality of this article is disputed . Please see the discussion on the talk page . Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved. (February 2010) Quantum mechanics Uncertainty principle Introduction Mathematical formulations Background Classical mechanics Old quantum theory Interference Bra-ket notation ... Hamiltonian Fundamental concepts Quantum state Wave function Superposition Entanglement ... Tunnelling Experiments Double-slit experiment Davisson–Germer experiment Stern–Gerlach experiment Bell's inequality experiment ... Quantum eraser Formulations Schrödinger picture Heisenberg picture Interaction picture Matrix mechanics ... Sum over histories Equations Schrödinger equation Pauli equation Klein–Gordon equation Dirac equation ... Objective collapse Advanced topics Quantum information science Scattering theory Quantum field theory Quantum chaos Scientists Bell Bohm Bohr Born ... e The EPR paradox (or Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox ) is a topic in quantum physics and the philosophy of science regarding measurements of microscopic systems (such as individual photons electrons or atoms ) and the description of those systems by the methods of quantum physics. It refers to a

118. The Crow Paradox : Krulwich Wonders… : NPR Jul 27, 2009 Here s a surprise Wild crows can recognize individual people. But people even people who love crows can t recognize individual crows. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106826971

119. Abstract And Table Of Contents For "The Paradox Of Identity" Report by William Greenberg. Argues for a Hegelian account of identity. http://structuredindividuals.com/paradox/toc.html

Home Next Table of Contents Bottom T he P aradox of I dentity Abstract: Call a semantics for singular terms extensionalist if it embraces (1) and classical if it embraces (2). The meaning of a singular term is exhausted by its reference. The reference of a singular term is an entity that is logically simple. Call a semantics adequate if it distinguishes material identity (the identity of a and b ) and formal identity (the identity of a and a Frege reacts to the inadequacy of classical extensionalist semantics by rejecting (1). This he does without a sideways glance at (2), whose background ontology he implicitly accepts. In contrast, my account of the difference between material and formal identity replaces that background ontology, the so-called ontology of individuals van Heijenoort's term), with an ontology whose ground-level objects are ontologically differentiated and logically complex. The semantics I urge for singular terms, while extensionalist in the sense of (1), is thus a non-classical semantics in which singular terms take structured individuals, or complexes (as I will say)

120. Time Travel Paradoxes A paradox of time travel arises in relation to this story. The narrator does indeed set himself up by his bootstraps his present and future selves all http://www.friesian.com/paradox.htm

Time Travel Paradoxes Robert Heinlein's 1941 story "By His Bootstraps" begins with the narrator writing in a philosophy thesis that time travel is impossible because time, in Immanuel Kant's terms, is only empirically real and does not exist independently among things in themselves. The narrator is then suddenly surprised to find two different versions of himself arriving from the future, with conflicting warnings and promises about what he can do. Traveling to the future, he meets an older man who repeats the promises, but whom he ends up distrusting. After some confusion, back in the present, he obtains some supplies and returns to the future to a period significantly earlier than when he would met the older man, intending to contest the future with him. Eventually, however, it turns out that he himself is the older man and his future is in fact, pace Immanuel Kant, secured. A paradox of time travel arises in relation to this story. The narrator does indeed set himself up "by his bootstraps" his present and future selves all interact with each other to produce the events. The paradoxical nature of this comes down to the case of a notebook that was provided to the narrator by the older man in the future. It contained a vocabulary of the language that was spoken by people in the future. The narrator learns the language and, as the book wears out over the years, copies it over into a notebook he had fetched from the present. This notebook, as it happens, is the very one he, as the older man, then provides to his other self. He is therefore the same person who both learns the knowledge from the notebook and put the knowledge into the notebook in the first place. The vocabulary as a certain list of items arranged in a certain way was thus complied by

Page 6     101-120 of 145    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | 6  | 7  | 8  | Next 20