Home  - Theorems_And_Conjectures - Completeness Theorem

Books Baby Camera Phones Computers Games DVD Electronics Kitchen Magazines Music Garden Software Tools Toys Video Apparel & Accessories Jewelry & Watches Musical Instruments Health & Personal Care Beauty Sports & Outdoors Office Products

e99.com Bookstore

Images

Newsgroups

21-40 of 93    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | Next 20

Completeness Theorem:     more books (37)

Relative completeness in algebraic specifications (LFCS report series. University of Edinburgh. Dept. of Computer Science. Laboratory for Foundations of Computer Science) by Lin Huimin, 1987 Analytic completeness in SL‚€ (Computer science technical report series. University of Maryland) by Jennifer Drapkin, 1986 An anti-unification aproach [sic] to decide the sufficient completeness of algebraic specifications (Rapport de recherche) by H Comon, 1986 Sufficient-completeness, quasi-reducibility and their complexity (Technical report. State University of New York at Albany. Dept. of Computer Science) by Deepak Kapur, 1987 Using symmetry and rigidity: A simpler approach to NP-completeness proofs (Tech report) by B. M. E Moret, 1985 A space searching method for checking the consistencey [sic] and completeness of a rulebase (DISCS publication) by W. W Tsang, 1987 Expressiveness bounds for completeness in trace-based network proof systems (Technical report. Cornell University. Dept. of Computer Science) by Jennifer Widom, 1987 Completeness results for circumscription (Computer science technical report series. University of Maryland) by Donald Perlis, 1985 Completeness problems in the structural theory of automata (Mathematische Forschung) by Jürgen Dassow, 1981 Completeness of resolution by transfinite induction (Report. Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica) by M Bezem, 1988 A Concise Introduction to Mathematical Logic (Universitext) by Wolfgang Rautenberg, 2009-12-17 Categoricity (University Lecture Series) by John T. Baldwin, 2009-07-24 Uncountably Categorical Theories (Translations of Mathematical Monographs) by Boris Zilber, 1993-03-09 Mathematical Logic: Proofs of Completeness and Incompleteness: An entry from Gale's <i>Science and Its Times</i> by Eric V. D. Luft, 2000

lists with details

21. Proofs And The Completeness Theorem
    File Format PDF/Adobe Acrobat Quick View  
    http://spot.colorado.edu/~szendrei/Found_F08/compl.pdf

22. Proving The Completeness Theorem Within Isabelle/HOL
    Abstract This is a report about formalisinga maths proof with the theorem prover Isabelle/HOL. The proof was for the completeness theorem of first order logic.  
    http://afp.sourceforge.net/entries/Completeness-paper.pdf

23. Godel's Completeness Theorem (logic) -- Britannica Online Encyclopedia
    Godel's completeness theorem (logic), Email is the email address you used when you registered. Password is case sensitive.  
    http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/236787/Godels-completeness-theorem
    
    Extractions: document.write(''); Search Site: With all of these words With the exact phrase With any of these words Without these words Home My Britannica CREATE MY Godel's comp... NEW ARTICLE ... SAVE Table of Contents: Article Article Related Articles Related Articles Citations LINKS Related Articles MLA Style: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/236787/Godels-completeness-theorem APA Style: . (2010). In http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/236787/Godels-completeness-theorem

24. Completeness Theorem
    completeness theorem Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics discussion  
    http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=243418

25. Completeness - Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia
    Cantor's theorem Church's theorem Church's thesis Consistency Effective method Foundations of mathematics G del's completeness theorem G del's incompleteness  
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Completeness
    
    Extractions: From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation search Look up completeness in Wiktionary , the free dictionary. In general, an object is complete if nothing needs to be added to it. This notion is made more specific in various fields. In logic , semantic completeness is the converse of soundness for formal systems . A formal system is "semantically complete" when all tautologies are theorems whereas a formal system is "sound" when all theorems are tautologies. Kurt Gödel Leon Henkin , and Emil Post all published proofs of completeness. (See History of the Church–Turing thesis .) A system is consistent if a proof never exists for both P and not P For a formal system S in formal language L, S is semantically complete or simply complete , if and only if every logically valid formula of L (every formula which is true under every interpretation of L) is a theorem of S. That is, A formal system S is strongly complete or complete in the strong sense if and only if for every set of premises , any formula which semantically follows from is derivable from Γ. That is

26. Re: Goedel Completeness Theorem
    In it he states the Goedel Completeness Theorem for S whose cardinality does not exceed the cardinality of the number If S is consistent then S has a model.  
    http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.math/2009-12/msg02262.html

27. G DEL'S COMPLETENESS THEOREM
    David Keyt G DEL'S COMPLETENESS THEOREM 0. Stated a. 'sentence' = 'sentence of '. 'theorem' = 'theorem of by the rules P, T, C, US, UG, and E'.  
    http://faculty.washington.edu/keyt/Completeness.pdf

28. A Completeness Theorem For Unrestricted First-Order Languages
    A Completeness Theorem for Unrestricted FirstOrder Languages Agust ın Rayoand Timothy Williamson July4,2003 1 Preliminaries Here is an account of logical consequence inspired by  
    http://web.mit.edu/arayo/www/lo.pdf

29. Kripke : A Completeness Theorem In Modal Logic
    If you are a member of the ASL, log in to Euclid for access. Fulltext is available via JSTOR, for JSTOR subscribers. Go to this article in JSTOR.  
    http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS?service=UI&version=1.0&verb=Display&h

30. Model Theory. Goedel's Completeness Theorem. Skolem's Paradox. Ramsey's Theorem.
    What is Mathematics? Goedel s Theorem and Around. Textbook for students. Appendix 1, 2. By K.Podnieks.  
    http://www.ltn.lv/~podnieks/gta.html
    
    Extractions: model theory, Skolem paradox, Ramsey theorem, Loewenheim, categorical, Ramsey, Skolem, Gödel, completeness theorem, categoricity, Goedel, theorem, completeness, Godel Back to title page Left Adjust your browser window Right Some widespread Platonist superstitions were derived from other important results of mathematical logic (omitted in the main text of this book): Goedel's completeness theorem for predicate calculus, Loewenheim-Skolem theorem, the categoricity theorem of second order Peano axioms. In this short Appendix I will discuss these results and their methodological consequences (or lack of them). All these results have been obtained by means of the so-called model theory . This is a very specific approach to investigation of formal theories as mathematical objects. Model theory is using the full power of set theory. Its results and proofs can be formalized in the set theory ZFC Model theory is investigation of formal theories in the metatheory ZFC. Paul Bernays , in 1958: "As Bernays remarks, syntax is a branch of number theory and semantics the one of set theory." See p. 470 of

31. Kurt Gödel (Stanford Encyclopedia Of Philosophy)
    G del shows that if the completeness theorem holds for formulas of degree k it must hold for formulas of degree k + 1. Thus the question of completeness reduces to formulas of  
    http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/goedel/
    
    Extractions: Please Read How You Can Help Keep the Encyclopedia Free First published Tue Feb 13, 2007 he was prophetic in anticipating and emphasizing the importance of large cardinals in set theory before their importance became clear. sought the grounds 2.1 The Completeness Theorem The completeness question for the first order predicate calculus was stated precisely and in print for the first time in 1928 by Hilbert and Ackermann in their text Theorem 1 Every valid logical expression is provable. Equivalently, every logical expression is either satisfiable or refutable. k it must hold for formulas of degree k + 1. Thus the question of completeness reduces to formulas of degree 1. That is, it is to be shown that any normal formula ( Q Q ) " stands for a (non-empty) block of universal quantifiers followed by a (possibly empty) block of existential ones. Q Q x x x x x n x n ). (Or more precisely, finite conjunctions of these in increasing length. See below.) Then in any domain consisting of the values of the different

32. Gödel's Completeness Theorem - Science Forums
    I'm currently reading this book called Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis, written by Paul Cohen, which is a modeltheoretic investigation of th  
    http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/44123-goedels-completeness-theorem/

33. The Completeness And Compactness Theorems Of First-order Logic « What’s New
    Apr 10, 2009 The famous Gödel completeness theorem in logic (not to be confused with the even more famous Gödel incompleteness theorem) roughly states  
    http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/04/10/the-completeness-and-compactness-theore
    
    Extractions: Updates on my research and expository papers, discussion of open problems, and other maths-related topics. By Terence Tao 10 April, 2009 in expository math.LO compactness theorem Godel completeness theorem ... Terence Tao The famous in logic (not to be confused with the even more famous ) roughly states the following: Let be a first-order theory (a formal language , together with a set of axioms, i.e. sentences assumed to be true), and let be a sentence in the formal language. Assume also that the language has at most countably many symbols. Then the following are equivalent: (i) (Syntactic consequence) can be deduced from the axioms in by a finite number of applications of the laws of deduction in first order logic. (This property is abbreviated as (ii) (Semantic consequence) Every structure which satisfies or models , also satisfies . (This property is abbreviated as (iii) (Semantic consequence for at most countable models) Every structure which is at most countable, and which models

34. G¨ODEL COMPLETENESS THEOREM 1. Properties Of And Are Sets
    File Format PDF/Adobe Acrobat Quick View  
    http://www.math.umn.edu/~richter/completenesstheorem.pdf

35. Completeness Theorem For Semantics Of Propositional Fragment Of One Ackerman's S
    Completeness Theorem for Semantics of Propositional Fragment of One Ackerman's System. Dmitri P. Skvortsov  
    http://logic.ru/en/node/352
    
    Extractions: W. Ackermann constructed a logical system with unrestricted comprehension principle. Here the propositional fragment of this logical sys-tem is considered. This logic is a weakening of the classical logic based on an informal interpretation of the implication as derivability in an unspecified deductive system. A Kripke-style semantics for this propositional logic is pro-posed and completeness theorem is proved.

36. Original Proof Of Godel's Completeness Theorem Phi Formula
    Original Proof Of Godel's Completeness Theorem Phi Formula Economy.  
    http://www.economicexpert.com/a/Original:proof:of:Godel:s:completeness:theorem.h

37. Post S Functional Completeness Theorem
    File Format PDF/Adobe Acrobat Quick View  
    http://www.sfu.ca/~jeffpell/papers/PostPellMartin.pdf

38. Human Completeness Theorem
    In computer theory there's a concept of Turingcomplete , applied to any machine or language which can do anything a Turing machine (an abstract model of computation) can do.  
    http://mindstalk.net/humancomplete.html
    
    Extractions: Updated 15 Nov 2004 In computer theory there's a concept of "Turing-complete", applied to any machine or language which can do anything a Turing machine (an abstract model of computation) can do. For real world devices the fact of limited memory is ignored; the idea is that they *could* emulate a Turing machine (which has infinite tape) given merely sufficient resources as opposed to missing some crucial machinery. Almost all computer languages are Turing-complete, it's actually pretty trivial to achieve. Make up a programming language which seems useful and it probably will be Turing-complete, unless you knew what you were doing. Whether or not human minds can be emulated by Turing machines is an open question. On the other hand, human minds can emulate Turing machines; it's just following instructions with the help of a lot of scratch paper. Slow and error-prone emulation to be sure, but those aren't too relevant for me. So, by a leap not of logic or evidence but of pure analogy, I state The General Human-Completeness Theorem : whatever one human has discovered, another human can learn, barring actual brain damage, a belief that one can't learn the material, or a lack of desire to do so. All other failures are attributable to bad teaching and presentation, not "stupidity", which merely governs speed.

39. Strong Completeness Theorem For MLL
    Date Thu, 28 May 1992 134438 +0100 (BST) A preliminary announcement of a result we have recently obtained follows. A paper is in preparation; as soon as it's ready, it will  
    http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/types/archives/1992/msg00075.html

40. A General NP-Completeness Theorem
    File Format PDF/Adobe Acrobat Quick View  
    http://theory.stanford.edu/~megiddo/pdf/smalecop.pdf

21-40 of 93    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | Next 20